Dietatic Association of Vegetarian Diets †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Dicuss about the Dietatic Association of Vegetarian Diets. Answer: Introduction: Diet and nutrition are key to sustenance of healthy body growth and good health status. The role played by diet in our bodies is paramount towards attaining optimal health. Choosing what to eat is solely the individual right, but however choosing to eat healthy is of concern and is important to anyone who Management values good health, (Knight Leitsberger, 2016). The type of food eaten forms the basis of your rights, decisions and perceived food type linked to your preference which contribute significantly on the differences between the vegetarians and the meat eaters. Amongst the vegetarians, there are several sub groups whom consume animal based products sparsely. This case study will analyse factors affecting the choice and consumption of these foods and compare the vegetarian and meat consumption. For an in-depth into the comparative analysis, we will focus of these factors. Nutrition and healthy living has formed the basis of vegetarian and meat based diets in the current society. The proponents of meat diets have attributed various advantages with regard to intake of meat. Outlined advantages arguably proposed are the presence of vitamin B12, which is only found in animal based foods and play a vital role in body health, while vegetarians diets, the source of vitamin B12 is prescribed through diet supplements as no plants have these vital compound for the body, (Hamad, 2013). The rich protein content of high biological value and micronutrients have led to advancement of meat based diets and risk of over consumption is high which have other harmful effects like gout diseases and weight management factors, (Knight Leitsberger, 2016). Comparing it to vegetarian diets, Nutritionist in the health practice have argued that protein quantity in vegan based diet are of standard levels compared to meat based diets as increased consumption patterns of meat leads to development of osteoporosis and gout disease. It is argued that the vegan based diet if carefully planned can provide the required nutrients for the body and wider variety of plant based foods is healthy and beneficial to our body unlike the meat based diets which have limitations and border lines which need careful consideration in meal planning so as not to be crossed. Religion has played an active role in dietary intakes of food. Worldwide food has been considered a major factor in various religion of the world. Vegetarian based diet has been characterised by consumption of plant based food while meat based diets have majored on the consumption of meat products. Pro vegetarian based supporters have argued on the sanctity of life for the animals which they claim should be respected. Unlike the meat based proponents, they considered meat as a delicacy and fulfilment of their body. The reasoning behind meat consumption has been based on the moral intuition of food, that it is acceptable as much their religion dont restrict. Recently questions have been raised on the ethics of eating meat, current arguments suggest that meat is not necessary for human health, (ADA, 2009) and the slaughter of animals has been argued as unjustifiable act, (Hamad, 2013). Generally vegetarianism and meat based dietary patterns have become the common theme in world religio ns, it has been used as an expression of faith, and however others object to it while on the other side of the coin meat based groups view on basis of religious reasoning as they use animal products on their daily lives though means such as wearing of clothes from animal products, use drugs based on animals and the fact that some vegetarian based diet include consumption of fish yet biologically it is animal class, conflicts itself, (Knight Leitsberger, 2016). The debate on the environmental Management factors on vegetarian based diet and meat based diet has taken centre stage for quite a long time with no definite standards set. The notion of vegetarian diet being better for the environment has formed the conventional wisdom on the proponents of this diet. It has suggested that diets rich in plant based foods such as vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts and seeds have less impact on the environment. The issue has been contentious in the world of science however the meat based consumers and analysts have counteracted these claims by stating that diet high in fruits and vegetables had greater environmental impacts through increase in the energy levels by more than 38 %. The debate in health cycle is taking shape with no standard measure being reached. Both scientists and consumers of both diets have gained a common ground that meat consumption have few environmental impacts in terms of land utility and the rearing of animals which have impacts on pollution on the environment due to gas pollutants, (Online, 2017). Vegetarian based diets production have an effect on the levels of gas emission on the atmosphere through the production, preservation and marketing of food however when compared to animal based foods, like fish, beef and lamb foods research has shown to have greater impacts on the environment though green house gas emissions. Current research has shown that red meat and processed food have presence of carcinogens at several anatomical sites and the source of thee carcinogenic has probably linked to environment, (Cross et al., 2007), unlike the vegan diet rich of plant based food which have been found to anti carcinogenic properties that ward off carcinogens and promote good health, (Wang et al., 2012). From the analysis above it is evident that there exist difference in diet patterns of food among the vegetarians and meat eating group. There are several factors which informs the choice and adoption of an individual food type and preference. Significant factors such as health impacts, environmental and religion play a role; there are numerous comparative and contrasting views with regards to these two categories of diets. Thus, there is need for mutual understanding on the differing views based on food types so as to create harmony despite these varying opinions. References American Dietetic Association (2009). "Position Paper of the American Dietatic Association: Vegetarian Diets" (PDF). Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 109 (7): 12661282. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2009.05.027. PMID19562864. Cross, A. J., Leitzmann, M. F., Gail, M. H., Hollenbeck, A. R., Schatzkin, A., Sinha, R. (2007). A prospective study of red and processed meat intake in relation to cancer risk. PLoS Med, 4(12), e325. Harnad, Stevan (2013) Luxe, ncessit, souffrance: Pourquoi je ne suis pas carnivore. Qubec humaniste 8(1): 10-13 Knight, A., Leitsberger, M. (2016). Vegetarian versus Meat-Based Diets for Companion Animals. Animals, 6(9), 57. Online access; Vegetarian and Healthy Diets Could Be More Harmful to the Management Environment. Accesed on 09/05/2017 .https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2015/.../diet-and-environment.html Wang, H., Oo Khor, T., Shu, L., Su, Z. Y., Fuentes, F., Lee, J. H., Tony Kong, A. N. (2012). Plants vs. cancer: a review on natural phyto chemicals in preventing and treating cancers and their drug ability. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (Formerly Current Medicinal Chemistry-Anti-Cancer Agents), 12(10), 1281-1305.